It has come to my attention, that many of you would like Nod69 to be a VAC-only community, instead of NonVAC. Some have left because of this, some have argued, it's time to take action. We've decided that you, the players and members of Nod69, should have a vote on this.
You have two weeks to decide, to vote. May the majority decide.
No VaC Cuz VaC is a fucked up system witch has auto ban and no administrators at all. (almost) Then rather use NaC its alot better and doesent just ban ppl for being good or looks like there hacking but bans after a scan of the computer and the files running whit the game. So deff no to VaC and yes to NaC
No VaC Cuz VaC is a fucked up system witch has auto ban and no administrators at all. (almost) Then rather use NaC its alot better and doesent just ban ppl for being good or looks like there hacking but bans after a scan of the computer and the files running whit the game. So deff no to VaC and yes to NaC
VAC is created and developed by Valve, that should already say that It's a lot better than NAC. NAC is made by indie coder, meaning the people who made it do not do coding for their job. Valve has a professional coding team that get paid for coding. What comes to the "no administrators" VAC is being updated everytime they find a hack/exploit that was not detected by their program. We have NAC in our server atm, and we have like... 10-20 cheaters in our server each day. 99% of them are VAC banned.
VAC. Cheaters should never be given a last chance, that way they never learn.
Darling @ VAC does NOT ban people for being better than other people, VAC ban people if they have modified the cvars or use programs that changes the cvars and settings of the game (r_drawothermodels, mat_wireframe.. etc). So if you're running Cheat Engine in the background while playing CS:S, you tab out and enable speedhack, chances of getting VAC banned is very high.
The only reason that i vote for NON-VAC is becaus that when kent used my account he hacked. Thats why i am VAC banned and votes for NON-VAC! Also will not make a new account on steam where im not vac banned in the closest future.
Arne, don't blame me for being VAC banned. You wanted to play CS:S and i asked if you want my old account. That means, you made a choice. So stop saying that it's my fail that you're VAC banned. If you don't like the account or something. I can take it back, then you got nothing to complain about.
No VaC Cuz VaC is a fucked up system witch has auto ban and no administrators at all. (almost) Then rather use NaC its alot better and doesent just ban ppl for being good or looks like there hacking but bans after a scan of the computer and the files running whit the game.
VAC only bans people for .exes or .dlls that inject into the program. NAC bans for sv_cheats, sv_pure, sv_consistency bypasses and nothing more. It can't scan for files or programs since it's just an addon. VAC is built into both the game and the Steam client, (VAC2 and VAC3). VAC cannot ban anyone for being good since it's completely computer driven. Even if VALVe personal saw someone cheat in-game they can't do something about it.
Non-Vac, Nod69 should stick to the roots that it started from.
There are simply to many VAC servers out there, also Nod69 rely's on Pure Donations. I'm assuming most of the sales are Admin, Almost everyone buy admin to make sure cheaters stay of the server although if VAC is inputted; Sales will drop dramatically.
VAC should only be inputted when Nod69 grow's and can expect donations even though the servers will be VAC.
Nod69 has stopped growing. It's actually dying. If VAC wins this vote, we can have a test period with VAC. If the amount of donations and players decrease, we can change back to non-vac.
Sticking to the roots isn't always be best option.
Whaat? That's silly. How am I suppose to ban people on a VAC server? It makes no sense. "Oh! You.. You just insulted a player.. Do.. Don't do it again and stuff or else you'll get banned for like.. 10 mins.." Pffttttt. Just keep them non-VAC's coming.
